Re: tiff-4.0.8nb1

Apparently CVS got quite confused because my patch, in addition to having $NetBSD$ at the top also had embedded $xxxx$ elsewhere, since I generated the patches by doing a cvs diff from the tiff cvs repo.

Seems our CVS replaced the tiff cvs tags, which made the checksums no good.

Thanks again for the cleanup.

- Tim

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Paul Goyette wrote:

Need to update distinfo?

=> Applying pkgsrc patches for tiff-4.0.8nb1
**************************************
Ignoring patch file /build/pkgsrc/graphics/tiff/patches/patch-libtiff_tif_dir.h: invalid checksum
**************************************
**************************************
Ignoring patch file /build/pkgsrc/graphics/tiff/patches/patch-libtiff_tif_dirinfo.c: invalid checksum
**************************************
**************************************
Ignoring patch file /build/pkgsrc/graphics/tiff/patches/patch-libtiff_tif_dirread.c: invalid checksum
**************************************

It's not just the checksums that are wrong. Regenerating the checksums results in the patches failing to apply. It appears that the first "hunk" in each patch file (containing a $NetBSD$ tag) refers to the patch files themselves and not to the files being patched!

+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+