Re: cups or cupsd?

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:18:01AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> 
> Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost> writes:
> 
> > print/cups-filters share/examples/rc.d/cups-browsed has:
> >
> > # PROVIDE: cups-browsed
> > # REQUIRE: cups
> >
> > whereas print/cups/files/cupsd.sh contains:
> >
> > # PROVIDE: cupsd
> > # REQUIRE: DAEMON
> >
> >
> > As we own cupsd.sh, s/cupsd/cups/ is the way forward?
> 
> Yes, that sounds right, and feel free to fix.  There aren't really rules
> that I know of about how PROVIDE matches the name, but it seems
> obviously best that it does.

Presumably as the binary package will be different, I'll have to bump
PKGREVISION, causing rebuilding of cups, so I'll wait a bit (presumbaly
hardly anyone uses cups-browsed).
We can then talk about whether the rc.d file should be called
cups or cupsd...

Cheers,

Patrick