Re: cpuset_t

[Jason Bacon <bacon4000%gmail.com@localhost>]

That makes sense...

I've now generated a patch I feel comfortable sending upstream and SLURM 
15.08.11 has passed basic testing on NetBSD and CentOS.  The patches 
should make it into the next release.

Thanks much,

    JB

On 05/14/16 14:57, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 14.05.2016 21:20, Jason Bacon wrote:
> > Not sure if this is the right list, but I'm guessing someone here might
> > be in the know.
> >
> > Porting the latest SLURM resource manager and ran into an off issue.
> >
> > sys/sched.h has the following typedef:
> >
> >      typedef struct _cpuset cpuset_t;
> >
> > The problem is, struct _cpuset is not defined anywhere in the headers.
> > I discovered that it's actually defined in
> >
> >      /usr/src/common/lib/libc/sys/cpuset.c
> >
> > Is cpuset_t not intended for public consumption at this point, or was
> > this just an oversight?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >      Jason
> cpuset_t is to be used as an opaque pointer.
>
> Check for example:
> pkgsrc-wip/rdsn-git/patches/patch-src_core_core_task__worker.cpp


--
All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers ... Each one owes
infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in
which he was born.
                -- Francois Fenelon