pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: gem'izing ruby-gnome2-*?

I wrote:

> wiz@ wrote:
> > > I wonder if we should keep PKGNAMEs for these packages and
> > > ruby-rcairo etc. (ruby-gnome2-glib needs glib2.gem for example)
> > 
> > Hm, I changed the name for ruby-rcairo to ruby-cairo to match the gem
> > name. I think this is easier to handle in the future than to stay with
> > old names forever...
> Hmm.  You mean ruby-gnome2-glib should also be changed to ruby-glib2?
> If we change PKGNAMEs, how PKGREVISIONs should be handled in
> packages which require these to-be-gem'ized packages in DEPENDS
> or buildlink?

I've tested gemizing all ruby-gnome2 (and ruby-rcairo) packages
based on pkgsrc-2015Q4:

- no PKGNAME rename
- DEPENDS and are updated per dependencies of gems
- meta-pkg/ruby-gnome2 is kept just to have common definitions
- there are several ruby-gnome2 based gems not in pkgsrc
  (webkit2-gtk, vte3)

Build in meta-pkg/ruby-gnome2 on NetBSD/i386 7.0 works,
and only pkgsrc/net/mikutter is tested as a client with
these gem'ized packages.

Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index