Re: recent pkgsrc-wip from rsync

[matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:54 PM, matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Thomas Klausner <tk%giga.or.at@localhost> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:50:01PM -0400, matthew sporleder wrote:
>>> I would like to give reposurgeon a try and was wondering if anyone had
>>> a recent pkgsrc-wip rsync available since sourceforge continues to be
>>> down.
>>
>> I've got a rsync from July 16. The last commit mails on pkgsrc-wip-cvs
>> are from the same day. My rsync job on the 17th failed, so some of the
>> commits on July 16 might be missing.
>>
>> http://www.netbsd.org/~wiz/pkgsrc-wip-repository-20150716.tar.gz
>>
>>  Thomas
>
> A pretty rote/non-involved conversion resulted in this:
> https://github.com/msporleder/pkgsrc-wip
>
> I left out all of the branches created by the conversion because I think
> they are useless tags of imports.
>
> I have a feeling that joyent is probably the best comparison:
> https://github.com/joyent/pkgsrc-wip
>
> if anyone has time to do a diff for where either one is missing stuff
> then I think we have a pretty good basis for wip going forward.
>
> If you had a real named branch that you want to preserve, please let me know
> and I will look for it.  Otherwise they all look like typos or cvs import's.
>
> Matt

git diff origin/master joyent/master shows pretty minior differences:
a lot of expanded cvs keywords, a few new packages, a few bug fixes/updates

---
git diff origin/master joyent/master|wc -l
    4216

---

I would recommend we just fork joyent/pkgsrc-wip since i think it gets the most
testing and then resolve those 4216 lines by hand as a mini-hackathon and just
move on from there.  All that's left is the final decision about hosting, etc.

Matt