Re: wip/gnuradio-core ( to be rename as just gnuradio ?)

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

Makoto Fujiwara <makoto%ki.nu@localhost> writes:

> I'm packaging gnuradio 3.7.2.1 at wip/gnuradio-core.
> Please give me comments on that. Thanks a lot.

First, our gnuradio stuff is old, and if you are the one updating, I'm
inclined to say you should do as you want.  Updating real pkgsrc sounds
good.

> The package name (and modularity) issue:
> The former one 3.3.0 (at meta-pkgs/gnuradio) was a collection
> of several packages of ham/gnuradio-*.
>
> But in this version (and with my understanding), the organization
> is changed (as of cmake build package). The modularity is now
> kept in options.mk. In this context, this gnuradio-core is to
> be renamed as just gnuradio.
> Please let me know if I'm doing wrong.

Well, options is awkward because binary packages get the default
options, only.  But if the default options are what almost everyone
wants, that's fine.  Pulling in qt, though, would be an issue for many.
How much does the base package pull in for dependencies?