Re: Packages for Meta-packages

[Manuel Wiesinger <manuel%bsdstammtisch.at@localhost>]

On 10/02/13 14:10, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> No. Did perhaps a dependency not package correctly?
> Take a look at meta/report.html.
Everything is fine at meta/report.html.
It seemed really wicked, in the end it turned out that it was just a 
stupid typo. Sorry. for the noise.

Manuel