[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] security/gnupg2 lists devel/editline dependency
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 03:56:59PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:26:00 +0900, Lokesh Mandvekar
> <lsm5%fedoraproject.org@localhost> wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:29:37AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> >>On what platform?
> >Linux (Fedora 19 x86)
> Do you have native readline (or editline) package?
I did have Fedora's native readline package.
> >>Do you have builtin readline or editline?
> >Hmm, from what I observe, readline was installed already, the
> >gnupg2 Makefile included mk/readline.buildlink3.mk and readline was also
> >present in my /var/db/pkg, but gnupg2 installation still complained
> >as shown below.
> It is expected behavior of mk/readline.buildlink3.mk.
> If builtin editline is found, it will be used,
> else if builtin readline is found, it will be used,
> otherwise, editline will be used (and installed from pkgsrc).
> (you can change the behavior with setting READLINE_DEFAULT variable)
> So I guessed, builtin detection is something wrong, or
> you have stale work directory.
> For later case, you can try `make clean' first.
Yup, this whole behavior occurred because of a stale work directory, starting
after a 'make clean' seemed to work. I guess this patch can be ignored.
> OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |