Re: mail/wl won't build: emacs version conflict

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>]

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:43:19 -0700
Min Sik Kim <minskim%bawi.org@localhost> wrote:

> At Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:38:18 +0900,
> "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:16:29 +0900, Aleksej Saushev 
> > <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > emacs-w3m-snapshot is incompatible with w3m(?)
> > >
> > > --- w3m.el.orig   2009-07-30 04:21:22.000000000 +0400
> > > +++ w3m.el        2009-08-16 23:36:18.000000000 +0400
> > > @@ -2668,7 +2668,7 @@
> > >          "-o" "strict_iso2022=0"
> > >          "-o" "fix_width_conv=1"
> > >          "-o" "use_jisx0201=0"
> > > -        "-o" "ucs_conv=1"
> > > +;               "-o" "ucs_conv=1"
> > >          '(if (eq w3m-input-coding-system 'binary)
> > >               (if charset (list "-I" 'charset))
> > >             (list "-I" (cond
> > 
> > Depend on w3m-unicode option (it is disabled by default on pkgsrc,
> > whereas "yes" by default for configure script)?
> 
> Do we need the w3m-unicode and w3m-m17n options at all?  According to
> the comments in options.mk, they were added to reduce the package
> size, but the saving is less than 1MB.  Considering that its
> dependencies require at least tens of megabytes, I don't think the
> package size is our concern.
> 
> If no one objects, I'd like to remove those options and enable both
> m17n and unicode support unconditionally.
> 
Works for me.


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb