Re: mail/wl won't build: emacs version conflict

[Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>]

> Do we need the w3m-unicode and w3m-m17n options at all?  According to
> the comments in options.mk, they were added to reduce the package
> size, but the saving is less than 1MB.  Considering that its
> dependencies require at least tens of megabytes, I don't think the
> package size is our concern.
>
> If no one objects, I'd like to remove those options and enable both
> m17n and unicode support unconditionally.

I'm fine with killing those two options.  Please go ahead.

Masao