Re: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)

[Klaus Heinz <k.heinz.jul.sechs%onlinehome.de@localhost>]

joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:55:26PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> > If we decide that share/examples is added automatically to 
> > CHECK_INTERPRETER_SKIP, this would indeed shut up.
> 
> I said before, I'm fine with that. The same for share/doc.
> emul will need some special handling as well, since absolute path and
> relative path have to be checked in some situations.

This would get my vote as well.

Nobody else spoke up, so could we please add share/examples and
share/doc?

ciao
     Klaus