pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)

To: pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
From: joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:48:46 +0200

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:55:26PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> If we decide that share/examples is added automatically to 
> CHECK_INTERPRETER_SKIP, this would indeed shut up.

I said before, I'm fine with that. The same for share/doc.
emul will need some special handling as well, since absolute path and
relative path have to be checked in some situations.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
  - From: Klaus Heinz

References:
- what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?
  - From: Klaus Heinz
- Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?
  - From: Johnny Lam
- Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?
  - From: Klaus Heinz
- share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
  - From: Roland Illig

Prev by Date: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
Next by Date: windowmaker fails to build
Previous by Thread: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
Next by Thread: Re: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index