pkgsrc-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[pkgsrc/trunk]: pkgsrc/doc/guide/files Removed outdated text about license ha...
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/pkgsrc/rev/3c76ae95dd2a
branches: trunk
changeset: 349526:3c76ae95dd2a
user: rillig <rillig%pkgsrc.org@localhost>
date: Sat Jul 09 14:44:06 2016 +0000
description:
Removed outdated text about license handling. Replaced difficult wording
with simple words. Restructured the sections, for quicker access.
diffstat:
doc/guide/files/fixes.xml | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diffs (117 lines):
diff -r b318706db274 -r 3c76ae95dd2a doc/guide/files/fixes.xml
--- a/doc/guide/files/fixes.xml Sat Jul 09 13:21:05 2016 +0000
+++ b/doc/guide/files/fixes.xml Sat Jul 09 14:44:06 2016 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<!-- $NetBSD: fixes.xml,v 1.137 2016/06/21 21:47:29 wiz Exp $ -->
+<!-- $NetBSD: fixes.xml,v 1.138 2016/07/09 14:44:06 rillig Exp $ -->
<chapter id="fixes"> <?dbhtml filename="fixes.html"?>
<title>Making your package work</title>
@@ -88,33 +88,22 @@
<sect2 id="handling-licenses">
<title>Handling licenses</title>
- <para>Authors of software can choose the licence under which
- software can be copied. This is due to copyright law, and reasons
- for license choices are outside the scope of pkgsrc. The pkgsrc
- system recognizes that there are a number of licenses which some
- users may find objectionable or difficult or impossible to comply
- with. The Free Software Foundation has declared some licenses
- "Free", and the Open Source Initiative has a definition of "Open
- Source". The pkgsrc system, as a policy choice, does not label
- packages which have licenses that are Free or Open Source.
- However, packages without a license meeting either of those tests
- are labeled with a license tag denoting the license. Note that a
- package with no license to copy trivially does not meet either the
- Free or Open Source test.</para>
+ <para>Authors of software can choose the licence under which software
+ can be copied. The Free Software Foundation has declared some
+ licenses "Free", and the Open Source Initiative has a definition of
+ "Open Source".</para>
- <para>For packages which are not Free or Open Source, pkgsrc will
- not build the package unless the user has indicated to pkgsrc that
- packages with that particular license may be built. Note that
- this documentation avoids the term "accepted the license". The
- pkgsrc system is merely providing a mechanism to avoid
- accidentally building a package with a non-free license;
- judgement and responsibility remain with the user. (Installation
- of binary packages are not currently subject to this mechanism;
- this is a bug.)</para>
+ <para>By default, pkgsrc allows packages with Free or Open Source
+ licenses to be built. To allow packages with other licenses to be
+ built as well, the pkgsrc user needs to add these licenses to the
+ <varname>ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES</varname> variable in &mk.conf;. Note
+ that this variable only affects which packages may be
+ <emphasis>built</emphasis>, while the license terms often also
+ restrict the actual use of the package and its redistribution.</para>
<para>One might want to only install packages with a BSD license,
or the GPL, and not the other. The free licenses are added to the
- default <varname>ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES</varname> variable. The
+ default <varname>ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES</varname> variable. The pkgsrc
user can override the default by setting the
<varname>ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES</varname> variable with "=" instead
of "+=". The licenses accepted by default are:
@@ -200,10 +189,31 @@
ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES+=xv-license
</programlisting>
+ <para>The use of <varname>LICENSE=shareware</varname>,
+ <varname>LICENSE=no-commercial-use</varname>, and similar language
+ is deprecated because it does not crisply refer to a particular
+ license text. Another problem with such usage is that it does not
+ enable a user to tell pkgsrc to proceed for a single package
+ without also telling pkgsrc to proceed for all packages with that
+ tag.</para>
+
+ <sect3 id="new-license">
+ <title>Adding a package with a new license</title>
+
<para>When adding a package with a new license, the following steps
are required:</para>
<orderedlist>
- <listitem><para>Check if the file can avoid the -license filename tag as described above by referencing <ulink url="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html">Various Licenses and Comments
about Them</ulink> and <ulink url="http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical">Licenses by Name | Open Source Initiative</ulink>. If this is the case, additionally add the license filename
to:</para>
+
+ <listitem><para>Check whether the license qualifies as Free or Open
+ Source by referencing <ulink
+ url="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html">Various Licenses
+ and Comments about Them</ulink> and <ulink
+ url="http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical">Licenses by Name |
+ Open Source Initiative</ulink>. If this is the case, the filename in
+ <filename>pkgsrc/licenses/</filename> does not need the
+ <filename>-license</filename> suffix, and the license name should be
+ added to:</para>
+
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para>DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES in <filename>pkgsrc/mk/license.mk</filename></para></listitem>
<listitem><para>default_acceptable_licenses in <filename>pkgsrc/pkgtools/pkg_install/files/lib/license.c</filename></para></listitem>
@@ -212,6 +222,11 @@
<para>with the proper syntax as demonstrated in those files, respectively.</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>The license text should be added to <filename>pkgsrc/licenses</filename> for displaying. A list of known licenses can be seen in this directory.</para></listitem>
</orderedlist>
+ </sect3>
+
+ <sect3 id="change-license">
+ <title>Change to the license</title>
+
<para>When the license changes (in a way other than formatting),
please make sure that the new license has a different name (e.g.,
append the version number if it exists, or the date). Just
@@ -221,14 +236,8 @@
pkgsrc does not evaluate licenses for reasonableness; the only
test is a mechanistic test of whether a particular text has been
approved by either of two bodies.</para>
-
- <para>The use of <varname>LICENSE=shareware</varname>,
- <varname>LICENSE=no-commercial-use</varname>, and similar language
- is deprecated because it does not crisply refer to a particular
- license text. Another problem with such usage is that it does not
- enable a user to tell pkgsrc to proceed for a single package
- without also telling pkgsrc to proceed for all packages with that
- tag.</para> </sect2>
+ </sect3>
+ </sect2>
<sect2 id="restricted-packages">
<title>Restricted packages</title>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index