Re: pkg/58799: earm binary packages are actually compiled for earmv4, resulting in a fatal warning when adding packages

["Ludit Gaj via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/58799; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ludit Gaj <gludit%proton.me@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/58799: earm binary packages are actually compiled for earmv4, resulting in a fatal warning when adding packages
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 22:17:51 +0000

 The mega verbose output is not so verbose:
 
 (regular)
 rez# pkg_add readline
 pkg_add: Warning: package `readline-8.2nb2' was built for a platform:
 pkg_add: NetBSD/earmv4 10.0 (pkg) vs. NetBSD/earm 10.0 (this host)
 pkg_add: 1 package addition failed
 
 (verbose)
 rez# pkg_add -vvv readline
 pkg_add: Warning: package `readline-8.2nb2' was built for a platform:
 pkg_add: NetBSD/earmv4 10.0 (pkg) vs. NetBSD/earm 10.0 (this host)
 pkg_add: 1 package addition failed
 
 On Thursday, 31 October 2024 at 23:10, nia via gnats <gnats-admin%NetBSD.or@localhost=
 g> wrote:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/58799; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: nia nia%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >=20
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: pkg/58799: earm binary packages are actually compiled for
 > earmv4, resulting in a fatal warning when adding packages
 > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 22:06:52 +0000
 >=20
 > As the message indicates, the warning isn't fatal. In fact, earm
 > is supposed to be an alias for earmv4. pkg_install's checks
 > are simply wrong.
 >=20
 > So, the real problem is somewhere else. Can we see the
 > mega-mega-verbose output?