Re: pkg/53934: shells/fish could use a `doc' option to make building documentation with doxygen optional

[Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/53934; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/53934: shells/fish could use a `doc' option to make building documentation with doxygen optional
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 21:50:06 +0100

 Hello Kamil,
 
 Kamil Rytarowski writes:
 > I propose to split the package into fish and fish-doc. This way it will
 > be more usable in binary prebuilt packages.
 
 IMHO this will just add more maintainer burden will little/no
 benefit.
 
 Binary package users already benefit from having the doc (and
 according the commit message this is also the rationale <maya>
 added an unconditional build dependency to doxygen) and not needing to
 have doxygen.