pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/53686: shells/pdksh building fails due to wrong preprocessor checking
The following reply was made to PR pkg/53686; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Fauberteau?= <triaxx%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/53686: shells/pdksh building fails due to wrong preprocessor checking
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:50:49 +0100
Le 2018-10-27 22:40, David H. Gutteridge a écrit :
> Are you building this as a result of bootstrapping pkgsrc (i.e.,
> using a "full" bootstrap, since the default bootstrap for Linux
> doesn't pull in pdksh, from what I can see)? Or are you building this
> for your own use? If the latter, have you considered mksh instead? I
> would strongly recommend using it over pdksh, if you simply want a ksh
> implementation. mksh is more actively maintained, and is my go-to on
> Linux.
It is a dependency for libuuid
> My understanding is that Arch Linux defines _FORTIFY_SOURCE in
> makepkg.conf[1]. Is this file being pulled in somehow (i.e., you're
> doing a "full" bootstrap, and so compiling using the native Arch
> environment)?
The error occurs in both context: full and not full bootstrap
> As a local workaround, you could also append your own redefinition of
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE to CPPFLAGS, either with -U or with -D setting the
> value to zero.
Could we imagine a supplementary test to use cc -E with -Wno-cpp? FMHO,
it does
not break anything. The following patch works but if somebody does not
agree, I
just modify my /etc/makepkg.conf (even if I prefer when it works
out-of-the-box).
----------8<--------------------------------------------------------------------
$NetBSD$
* On Arch Linux, cc-wrapper is built such as _FORTIFY_SOURCE is defined.
This
fix avoids #warning to make the preprocessor checking failed.
--- configure.orig 2018-10-30 04:18:53.913128552 +0000
+++ configure
@@ -910,12 +910,34 @@ else
echo "configure: failed program was:" >&5
cat conftest.$ac_ext >&5
rm -rf conftest*
+ # Arch Linux defines _FORTIFY_SOURCE in CPPFLAGS but the warnings
should not
+ # failed the checking process
+ CPP="${CC-cc} -E -Wno-cpp"
+ cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<EOF
+#line 899 "configure"
+#include "confdefs.h"
+#include <assert.h>
+Syntax Error
+EOF
+ac_try="$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext >/dev/null 2>conftest.out"
+{ (eval echo configure:905: \"$ac_try\") 1>&5; (eval $ac_try) 2>&5; }
+ac_err=`grep -v '^ *+' conftest.out`
+if test -z "$ac_err"; then
+ :
+else
+ echo "$ac_err" >&5
+ echo "configure: failed program was:" >&5
+ cat conftest.$ac_ext >&5
+ rm -rf conftest*
CPP=/lib/cpp
fi
rm -f conftest*
fi
rm -f conftest*
ac_cv_prog_CPP="$CPP"
+fi
+rm -f conftest*
+ ac_cv_prog_CPP="$CPP"
fi
CPP="$ac_cv_prog_CPP"
else
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index