pkgsrc-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg/52644: 'go build' command fails with 'undefined' variable error.



I will put it this way, if you want to add it, add it yourself,
else, request for it properly rather than accusing and
comparing with the linux documentation.

On 29 October 2017 at 22:00, Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/52644; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
> To:
> Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: pkg/52644: 'go build' command fails with 'undefined' variable
>  error.
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 17:28:31 +0100
>
>  This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
>  --Mnqx4Lbj7jKAflDuQoGvUseqJcGFR7FkI
>  Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ewfjhqj7rc1Oop4pQ5QnnI6SnqNFsWgI9";
>   protected-headers="v1"
>  From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
>  Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
>  Message-ID: <659e9306-b478-d2f2-47ec-182263626da7%gmx.com@localhost>
>  Subject: Re: pkg/52644: 'go build' command fails with 'undefined' variable
>   error.
>  References: <pr-pkg-52644%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
>   <20171023110612.083167A1D3%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
>   <20171029161001.8CBA37A1F1%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
>   <CADd-wOZchJWgi0pKB6qOOe0Fp=-skjjuiuTM23vWQwimWn1dUA%mail.gmail.com@localhost>
>   <bb77252b-ab6d-e711-b35b-ebfd0d5fa4aa%gmx.com@localhost>
>   <CADd-wOYVn+iz0ZvpoL-6yWe1iMWcwGv4=bp-xyJ1uUiT1oL1hw%mail.gmail.com@localhost>
>  In-Reply-To: <CADd-wOYVn+iz0ZvpoL-6yWe1iMWcwGv4=bp-xyJ1uUiT1oL1hw%mail.gmail.com@localhost>
>
>  --ewfjhqj7rc1Oop4pQ5QnnI6SnqNFsWgI9
>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>  Content-Language: en-US
>  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>  On 29.10.2017 17:20, Utkarsh Anand wrote:
>  > Can you tell me the effect of makefiles on
>  > 'the procedure of installing go'. As far as I
>  > know, its the same even without makefiles.
>  >=20
>  > On 29 October 2017 at 21:50, Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:
>  >> On 29.10.2017 17:15, Utkarsh Anand wrote:
>  >>> The insructions to install go (that way) has been the same
>  >>> for ages, just like python (the instructions have been the
>  >>> same since ages in this case too.) and that is what you're
>  >>> expected to know. So, this is a fair comparison by all
>  >>> means.
>  >>
>  >> This is out of context. Regular go packages don't even have Makefiles.=
>
>  >>
>
>  I will put it that way, if you think this is not appropriate in
>  walkthrough. Try to remove it from Linux setup documentation and check
>  if people start to object.
>
>
>  --ewfjhqj7rc1Oop4pQ5QnnI6SnqNFsWgI9--
>
>  --Mnqx4Lbj7jKAflDuQoGvUseqJcGFR7FkI
>  Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>  Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>  Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
>
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  Version: GnuPG v2
>
>  iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZ9gG2AAoJEEuzCOmwLnZs0osP/j5aPk8QgJFQZ6Qcdj56eqXf
>  qYzRs4iAnBjUwG8aUBbNO4WyPthDTriLPGvB/y86sWxRLTv+1wWV9w7iViC79VZi
>  qMpjssEv94fVqPQZvl420dWwgWdwMoKlG+SjNr2Dq2ded432NKhGCqRdNOPm1yZR
>  pHyoo0JTu8QskyrciM05m83zyWwI566IZUtCX57XANTzDkN/e9n0coBbs8oTQII6
>  DoPJtQQOzjF1Q8IkA/cUvTz7qFnOWls6lSf5Cd0/7Xcf4Ub47/tY6TQTvpm1Sqj+
>  UTrX3pwIKYPloInIcUAcucK4IdPNf26R5wYI5m2asG/FJ5a6O0xEUe95QqXLuwq9
>  iJ69X6V0lHH6KUOUuNFOAueKIfJAGYLZFpxLJmDhnIaaZ+eDDWP5L6NNECvTA66l
>  mgUVs1OhB1JdPrhS5/ViAzSYJpRd4qSrBSTE8w6vEVeWLOAWN0AF/UVUzADY+bxh
>  z56s69xlUqJ593rudm5odDSNdESsD2H6Paf4TuEWF7/HZOBew0pGrAIZDZzfXjDT
>  bbIFLEjx5E9bUaW0RHfgVbLTaYBGeO8NugykJmdBUk/3p5nrPm5k/Vn1BGIREXdh
>  IR6Xcc5MRw4/iMgZVkjhGulocHFeKej+L6cNTUenyZGVxYcV5i3VJJOX6+8uSNjX
>  TU8/oX5WVLbC1LuUjPh2
>  =McGb
>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>  --Mnqx4Lbj7jKAflDuQoGvUseqJcGFR7FkI--
>


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index