pkgsrc-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg/52644: 'go build' command fails with 'undefined' variable error.



The insructions to install go (that way) has been the same
for ages, just like python (the instructions have been the
same since ages in this case too.) and that is what you're
expected to know. So, this is a fair comparison by all
means.

On 29 October 2017 at 21:40, Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/52644; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: pkg/52644: 'go build' command fails with 'undefined' variable
>  error.
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 17:10:41 +0100
>
>  This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
>  --fjpT4ouiJ3FmASgjnR5taOLXN1lNBlUmN
>  Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="88u1wc77b9ksL2SaXUrI3uM9VW8a1IbAd";
>   protected-headers="v1"
>  From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
>  To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
>  Message-ID: <af6ac547-1921-dfeb-1cca-98673cab96b8%gmx.com@localhost>
>  Subject: Re: pkg/52644: 'go build' command fails with 'undefined' variable
>   error.
>  References: <pr-pkg-52644%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
>   <20171023110612.083167A1D3%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
>   <20171029154501.943407A1EF%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
>   <CADd-wOaXqUKPE70px8wPw2OtEdycLO320gG6jVwp5F42_zYfOQ%mail.gmail.com@localhost>
>  In-Reply-To: <CADd-wOaXqUKPE70px8wPw2OtEdycLO320gG6jVwp5F42_zYfOQ%mail.gmail.com@localhost>
>
>  --88u1wc77b9ksL2SaXUrI3uM9VW8a1IbAd
>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>  Content-Language: en-US
>  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>  On 29.10.2017 16:51, Utkarsh Anand wrote:
>  > Do you want to see, how to install python, in every python
>  > repository? The same way, syzkaller documentation is
>  > not supposed to show you how to install go and BTW,
>  > I always set up go that way, no matter which machine I'm
>  > using.
>  > Secondly, the bug is already closed. Kindly check yourself.
>  >=20
>
>  The information from
>  https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/linux/setup.md
>  could be repeated or adapted for !Linux case and this PR wouldn't be
>  raised at all.
>
>  I'm not aware about circumstances that every Python package points out
>  certain commits in GCC and Linux kernel to gain certain features, so
>  this comparison isn't valid.
>
>
>  --88u1wc77b9ksL2SaXUrI3uM9VW8a1IbAd--
>
>  --fjpT4ouiJ3FmASgjnR5taOLXN1lNBlUmN
>  Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>  Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>  Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
>
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  Version: GnuPG v2
>
>  iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZ9f2SAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZsyd0P/35ExECkA0v98nENFWfFU7cc
>  J3yyns6VTt0rNFBn9HCBYVzY/kka16IvApjsGpTqNPVslhLYMcMYNv2u1lXfrFaH
>  XtjMVAQvHunopnE3WjgYTD2bCMwaAgvHcAWNdQpmxU1ddTXM1uLqyMp3f9biz8mp
>  Mp/fp9rj/W1psA/KT+Pv8idmGYfY/bP6T+qzyP8ywRx3I/L3Zpee2oFpXLaWbVdl
>  5EmZa+rrx7qticb2wwhNuLPmqV15SF5/kmPC4OJizK9qiknqVQ2AmYEgSCVG6Ok8
>  7qTiaO2nBSJZa4ga9DNxBs4qu9fdfH47WWxzexZBEs8KdbV4ahQroqxM+ASwjDZ9
>  ZRuanfEJaL4sAGDuHwoNet6+HeslJeWv0Hb6aHHnLjbV3yqS9aKkBP6Fcv0vkx+k
>  4e+igIFIdcEFm66MRQmJ8pgf5E/rxrVmrYxrw+8xk3AEhWe7Y9TL7pVygWxrLKbD
>  LlrOyW7yLstfd4s7ZVm84IYYegGwO6kuRa0bCb0a04I/Vm6xSgkH4hn9y0uA/hOD
>  FtvQKQrqGZ6ePBSv2p01p+PhPv6pzIy4LudrrU0JiZ365ftcbFOfdxr7aCvRbRtG
>  BzFgaabEAo3vEV9hl/Eggyih3Spu53loG+0Wuq3lyyvAVJufX0MATBAfpFcRSkye
>  GYtuDdegQCNRGIoYmTBz
>  =fzsT
>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>  --fjpT4ouiJ3FmASgjnR5taOLXN1lNBlUmN--
>


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index