Re: pkg/52284: cwrappers and chekperms don't build with clang

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/52284; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/52284: cwrappers and chekperms don't build with clang
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 18:05:13 +0200

 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
 --HfXQrogAAjRORUqs8AtfAv4M8W9OsNjqO
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="npag0BLcq3qN2Hw8iaw9gVGDxDnIukdhl";
  protected-headers="v1"
 From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
 To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 Message-ID: <e76366d5-0b46-2356-2922-7b88e98832cf%gmx.com@localhost>
 Subject: Re: pkg/52284: cwrappers and chekperms don't build with clang
 References: <pr-pkg-52284%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
  <20170608140420.601477A283%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
  <20170608153002.B2B277A2A6%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
 In-Reply-To: <20170608153002.B2B277A2A6%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
 
 --npag0BLcq3qN2Hw8iaw9gVGDxDnIukdhl
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On 08.06.2017 17:30, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/52284; it has been noted by GNAT=
 S.
 >=20
 > From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.=
 org,
 > 	n54%gmx.com@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/52284: cwrappers and chekperms don't build with clang
 > Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:27:40 +0200
 >=20
 >  On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:10:01PM +0000, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
 >  >  >  HAVE_LLVM=3Dyes, just as normal for base.
 >  > =20
 >  >  Shouldn't this be already set automatically with PKGSRC_COMPILER=3D=
 clang
 > =20
 >  Not really, since it only affects the NetBSD mk rules and it is alread=
 y
 >  the documented mechanism for using clang in first place.
 > =20
 >  Joerg
 > =20
 >=20
 
 My proposal is to make it turned on for PKGSRC_COMPILER=3Dclang.
 
 I just discussed it with community member, he was building cwrappers and
 checkperms for months with GCC (and with Clang other packages) because
 of this breakage. I used example config that was apparently prepared on
 other system. I'm not the only one who was confused here.
 
 
 --npag0BLcq3qN2Hw8iaw9gVGDxDnIukdhl--
 
 --HfXQrogAAjRORUqs8AtfAv4M8W9OsNjqO
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2
 
 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZOXW+AAoJEEuzCOmwLnZsZ6EQAMX30DBSH9HRPvi+6Ew9IkZx
 0uXA9quLsQQR2wKFYjFJ8g/r5ZapPt97LtbnyN2PhOrqYWwe/MHB6bbLl0rCxVq4
 OdmdQnw2sRyJrUIbxE9kASUL9cd47R8uKin502rRKgOGD6M7/+R+K3AY70wh+sfg
 Zb+I2TBBapqqUiOK10Z6E0mu9bfRRAS7UCCLQhyPG14Gm8OmWl2ck7gaEQJFpwfN
 JWlYVxW0BsbEEc1FQOOjSR/lg2lh/DByHtUcRqo2pBkF/dqsggzDrCvbQRwXKnYj
 cOxaKITjIrPIoWA5GR1xp8zfaqltl71maV65UDqVV/he8M1K1YjIt5dCwLu5jIdj
 7RhQQjZ84oMJYS1U7NTL1GLfdiUXsFVEE+lxL0Lt2r/oKm4tHbQb+8KeYtgr5JIA
 D51YyTOry/B6nrbiuR4VyVggxwBNzYWyRr6nYdEXzJXP4a+gEqoexKDTpP16INSw
 LZY/zTP+9iXaUxs2yK9QyMGKsLvGk81ml2p5RSHaBxhUyEaK1lkThlSdBHZTDxwK
 EvA6eAOcA+MPogZq6hEKKvimDxeoW+vOfxDdw/jxJv666aMZnnxjzof7kGZChw6t
 3am14mkhhS8YaHjDlVhNyDPTyXZsanJ0i+Kk1PeyPfBxlmwhmy+umYl3lOrDTfys
 ZaNTVCiH6i2vPnoztEN+
 =u9Ew
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --HfXQrogAAjRORUqs8AtfAv4M8W9OsNjqO--