pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/50645: Submission to add new package textproc/py-docx
The following reply was made to PR pkg/50645; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/50645: Submission to add new package textproc/py-docx
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:31:56 +0000
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:35:01AM +0000, David H. Gutteridge wrote:
> (By the way, from what I've seen, it doesn't appear there's a way of
> specifically denoting test-only dependencies in pkgsrc. Would the
> typical approach in this case be to note them as build dependencies,
> or leave them out entirely?)
Maybe we should have TEST_DEPENDS. It's annoying to have a bunch of
unused stuff yanked in when you aren't intending to test something.
Not sure how to fit it into the existing framework though...
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index