pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/48830: libreoffice4-4.2.2.1 build screwed by ruby211-2.1.1's tcl-8.5.15nb1 build
The following reply was made to PR pkg/48830; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Havard Eidnes <he%uninett.no@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, mlr%rse.com@localhost
Cc: pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/48830: libreoffice4-4.2.2.1 build screwed by
ruby211-2.1.1's tcl-8.5.15nb1 build
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 11:04:27 +0200 (CEST)
> =3D=3D=3D> Install binary package of tcl-8.6.1nb3
> pkg_add: A different version of tcl-8.6.1nb3 is already installed: tc=
l-8.5.15nb1
> pkg_add: 1 package addition failed
>
> and so, since libreoffice wants a tcl greater than 8.6, while
> ruby21 wants a tcl less than 8.6, we're at an impossible
> impass.
>
>>How-To-Repeat:
>
> Build /usr/pkgsrc/lang/ruby21. Then build /usr/pkgsrc/misc/libreoffi=
ce4
>>Fix:
>
> delete, and forget about the one or the other.
Just some comments / ramblings:
It seems that in pkgsrc, x11/ruby-tk is the last holdout which
requires tcl and tk older than 8.6. Perhaps it should "get with the
program" and update? However, the trivial attempt with
Index: Makefile
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/x11/ruby-tk/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -r1.43 Makefile
--- Makefile 10 Mar 2014 14:23:51 -0000 1.43
+++ Makefile 25 May 2014 07:50:42 -0000
@@ -36,6 +36,6 @@
=
.include "../../lang/ruby/modules.mk"
.include "../../lang/ruby/Makefile.common"
-.include "../../lang/tcl85/buildlink3.mk"
-.include "../../x11/tk85/buildlink3.mk"
+.include "../../lang/tcl/buildlink3.mk"
+.include "../../x11/tk/buildlink3.mk"
.include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
results in sour messages from the configure machinery in x11/ruby-tk
that it really does need Tcl/Tk 8.5 or older. So ... more effort is
required to follow that path. Does anyone know what specifically in
ruby-tk is incompatible with newer Tcl/Tk?
Tweaking the configure script like this:
: {289} cat ../../lang/ruby21-base/patches/patch-ext_tk_extconf.rb =
$NetBSD$
--- ext/tk/extconf.rb.orig 2013-11-30 02:46:47.000000000 +0000
+++ ext/tk/extconf.rb
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ TkLib_Config =3D {}
TkLib_Config['search_versions'] =3D
# %w[8.9 8.8 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.0 7.6 4.2]
# %w[8.7 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.0]
- # %w[8.7 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.0] # to shorten search steps
- %w[8.5 8.4] # At present, Tcl/Tk8.6 is not supported.
+ %w[8.7 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.0] # to shorten search steps
+ # %w[8.5 8.4] # At present, Tcl/Tk8.6 is not supported.
=
TkLib_Config['unsupported_versions'] =3D
- %w[8.8 8.7 8.6] # At present, Tcl/Tk8.6 is not supported.
+ %w[8.8 8.7] # At present, Tcl/Tk8.6 is not supported.
=
TkLib_Config['major_nums'] =3D '87'
=
: {290} =
and doing a "make mps" in ruby21-base (after placing the patch file as
above) lets ruby212-tk-2.1.2nb3 install, but I don't know if it will
work, and I don't know how to test it. As far as I can see, though,
there are no warnings from the C compilations done in x11/ruby-tk.
I'm not all that familiar with ruby, and without setting any make
variables, it seems that the build of ruby21 stops because ruby-gdbm
selected ruby200, and after happily installing ruby200-gdbm-2.0.0p481
the build stops with
ERROR: [depends.mk] A package matching ``ruby212-gdbm>=3D2.1.2'' should=
ERROR: be installed, but one cannot be found. Perhaps there is a
ERROR: stale work directory for ../../databases/ruby-gdbm?
and I can assure you that there was no stale work dir.
Looking at lang/ruby/rubyversion.mk suggests that I should maybe set
RUBY_VERSION_DEFAULT to 21, so I put that in /etc/mk.conf, and this
fixes the build in databases/ruby-gdbm/ to install ruby212-gdbm-2.1.2.
Confusingly, it seems that setting RUBY_VERSION_DEFAULT in the
environment causes x11/ruby-tk to select building with ruby200,
despite my setting in /etc/mk.conf. Removing that variable from the
environment fixes it to try to build ruby212-tk-2.1.2nb3!?!
Can someone please confirm that setting RUBY_VERSION_DEFAULT in
/etc/mk.conf is a requirement to have ruby21 built properly?
Regards,
- H=E5vard
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index