pkg/48417: fonts/tex-fontname-doc plist failure

[dholland%netbsd.org@localhost]

>Number:         48417
>Category:       pkg
>Synopsis:       fonts/tex-fontname-doc plist failure
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    pkg-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Nov 30 03:45:00 +0000 2013
>Originator:     David A. Holland
>Release:        NetBSD -current, pkgsrc 20131129
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD valkyrie 6.99.19 NetBSD 6.99.19 (VALKYRIE) #13: Sun Nov  3 
17:07:36 EST 2013  dholland@valkyrie:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/VALKYRIE 
amd64
Architecture: x86_64
Machine: amd64
>Description:

tex-fontname-doc now fails like this:

=> Checking file-check results for tex-fontname-doc-2010
ERROR: ************************************************************
ERROR: The following files are in the PLIST but not in 
/scratch/fonts/tex-fontname-doc/work/.destdir/usr/pkg:
ERROR:         
/scratch/fonts/tex-fontname-doc/work/.destdir/usr/pkg/info/fontname.info
ERROR: ************************************************************
ERROR: The following files are in 
/scratch/fonts/tex-fontname-doc/work/.destdir/usr/pkg but not in the PLIST:
ERROR:         
/scratch/fonts/tex-fontname-doc/work/.destdir/usr/pkg/share/texmf/doc/info/fontname.info

that is, the info file is now getting installed under share/texmf,
presumably due to recent tex infrastructure changes.

>How-To-Repeat:

make stage-install

>Fix:

Should the plist be updated, or should tbe package be forced to
install the info file in the info dir pkgsrc knows about? The former
is easier, but I suspect if anyone actually wants to read the info
file we'd better do the latter.