pkgsrc-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg/43915 (devel/doxygen fails to install)



The following reply was made to PR pkg/43915; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/43915 (devel/doxygen fails to install)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:01:48 +0000

 On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:05:04PM +0000, J?rn Clausen wrote:
  >  >   Is the configure output different? Without actually looking at the
  >  >   package, my first guess would be that it's failing to find latex or
  >  >   something similar.
  >  
  >  On NetBSD, I get:
  >  
  >  Full dependency tex-latex-[0-9]*: found tex-latex-2011
  >  Full dependency tex-latex-bin-[0-9]*: found tex-latex-bin-2010
  >  
  >  On Solaris, I get:
  >  
  >  Full dependency tex-latex-[0-9]*: found tex-latex-2011
  >  Full dependency tex-latex-bin-[0-9]*: found tex-latex-bin-2010
 
 Weird.
 
  >  I was not able to spot any significant differences in the output from 
  >  the builds, but due to different paths they are a little bit hard to 
  >  read. I can send these outputs on request.
 
 I would say don't bother, but if you think another pair of eyes might
 spot something send them along I guess.
 
  >  Apart from that, I'd like to stop investing my time in a package that I 
  >  have no need for...
 
 Certainly. I'll mark the PR as "stuck" to try to attract someone else
 to test, or we can just close it entirely if you prefer.
 
 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index