Re: pkg/44792: graphics/magicpoint build problem with X11_TYPE == "modular"?

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/44792; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, Joerg Sonnenberger 
<joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/44792: graphics/magicpoint build problem with X11_TYPE ==
 "modular"?
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:06:59 +0200

 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:01:59PM +0900, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
 > In message <20110330073502.23E0163B898%www.NetBSD.org@localhost>
 >      on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:35:02 +0000 (UTC),
 >      Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
 > >  On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:25:01AM +0000, taca%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > >  > In file included from imlib_loader.c:8:
 > >  > 
 > > /pkg_comp/obj/pkgsrc/graphics/magicpoint/default/.buildlink/include/X11/extensio
 > >  > ns/shape.h:34:39: error: X11/extensions/shapeconst.h: No such file or 
 > > directory
 > >  > *** [imlib_loader.o] Error code 1
 > >  
 > >  What provides X11/extensions/shape.h?
 > x11/xextproto
 
 No, actually, libXext provides that.
 And its bl3.mk says:
 # XXX don't include xextproto/bl3 here; packages checking for xext.pc must
 # include it theirselfes
 
 I don't think that this is appropriate, since libXext's shape.h can
 pull in xextproto's shapeconst.h.
 
 Drochner wanted to add this inclusion, but joerg asked him to back it
 out.
 
 Joerg, can you please explain again why it shouldn't be included here?
 Or can we include it now?
  Thomas