Re: Bind ending up in Parked state. (pkg)

To: Søren P. Skou <sps%t-rex.dk@localhost>
Subject: Re: Bind ending up in Parked state. (pkg)
From: Andreas Gustafsson <gson%gson.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:08:17 +0200

Søren P. Skou wrote:
> Shouldn't it be more efficient having more threads?

With threads, it has to do locking, which slows things down a bit.
The point of the multithreading is to be able to utilize multiple CPU
cores, which can be useful if you have more DNS traffic than a single
core can handle.
-- 
Andreas Gustafsson, gson%gson.org@localhost

References:
- Bind ending up in Parked state.
  - From: Søren P. Skou
- Re: Bind ending up in Parked state.
  - From: Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: Bind ending up in Parked state.
  - From: Søren P. Skou
- Re: Bind ending up in Parked state.
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: Bind ending up in Parked state.
  - From: Søren P. Skou
- Re: Bind ending up in Parked state. (pkg)
  - From: Anders Mundt Due
- Re: Bind ending up in Parked state. (pkg)
  - From: Søren P. Skou

Prev by Date: NPF error "npfctl_config_send: File exists"
Next by Date: using gcc -w
Previous by Thread: Re: Bind ending up in Parked state. (pkg)
Next by Thread: Re: Bind ending up in Parked state.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index