NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: dynamic authenticated tunnel set-up
In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.1402121206510.8692%screamer.whooppee.com@localhost>,
Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> wrote:
>In the not-too-distant future, I'll be moving overseas, to a location where
>fixed IPv4 network addresses are unavailable (or at least, they will be
>prohibitively expensive!)
>
>I'm planning to get a virtual machine in a US location, with a single fixed
>IPv4 address. All of my other machines will be sitting behind some ISP's NAT
>device. And that ISP doesn't do IPv6.
>
>I would like to set things up so that my US-based virtual host is a backup MX
>mail server for my domain, and one of the behind-the-NAT machines would be the
>primary mail server.
>
>I can get an adequate supply of fixed IPv6 addresses from the company that
>hosts the US-based virtual machine, so I can assign addresses to the
>behind-the-NAT machines. But I would need some sort of tunnel between the
>virtual host and the rest of the machines.
>
>I know I can set this up using "ssh -w" and tun(4) devices, but the ssh man
>page seems to indicate that this is not necessarily a good solution (due to
>significant overhead?).
>
>So I'm looking for other options. My primary requirements are fairly simple:
>
>* the tunnel needs to be established regardless of the address/port being used
>on the behind-the-NAT end
>
>* the tunnel establishment must be authenticated in some manner, so that only
>my systems can connect
>
>* the outer (encapsulating) protocol must be IPv4, while the inner
>(encapsulated) protocol must be IPv6
>
>* it would also be highly desired that the tunnel establishment occur
>automatically, and with automatic retry if the connection drops
>
>Any suggestions on something simple?
Not too simple, but I use L2TP via the pkgsrc xl2tpd.
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index