Re: fsck out of swap

[Frank Wille <frank%phoenix.owl.de@localhost>]

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:02:43 -0700
Chuck Swiger <cswiger%mac.com@localhost> wrote:

> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Frank Wille wrote:
> > Did that happen to anybody yet? How many memory is needed to run fsck(8)
> > in the worst case? My NAS has 64MB.
> 
> It's on the order of 1GB of RAM (or swap) is needed for fsck(8) upon a 1
> terabyte filesystem.

That's good to know.

So when running low memory systems with big disks, enabling WAPBL should
be mandatory.

-- 
Frank Wille