Re: A question of RAID

[Frank Wille <frank%phoenix.owl.de@localhost>]

Greg Toxel wrote:

> I always go for RAIDframe and RAID-1; disks are free compared to labor
> hours.  I have used it for a long time, probably 2001ish, and it's been
> solid.  One of the benefits is that a NetBSD kernel with EITHER of
> those disks in any random box will work.

Sounds good. But how about the performance? A 1.6 GHz Atom 330 is not the
fastest, and it has to serve many SQL, POP3 and HTTP requests at once.
Would I notice a massive slowdown compared to the hardware-approach?

-- 
Frank Wille