Re: Releng: Some ports/archs missing?

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:27:46AM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> 	sparc64      sparc64
> 	virt68k      m68k
[..]
> I don't know if that list was just prepared by hand, of if
> known-broken variants were execluded. But it would be worth adding at
> least sparc64 and virt68k. (With Sparc64 IMHO being one of the watched
> ports for reproducible builds and virt68k just having been added to
> the `build.sh` generated list just three weeks ago.

I am not sure what you mean here. There definitively is a regular build
for sparc64. virt68k is too new and has not been added yet (we do that
manually on request of the developer who added the port usually when
they think it builds a clean release).

I have no idea how many of the other combinations make any sense (or have
hardware that exists) - if any portmaster thinks we should add more to the
releng builds, I'll be happy to do so.

However, I would like to avoid any arbitrary unused builds adding to the
already way too large build time on the cluster.

Martin