NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-amd64/58982: NetBSD 10.1 install image (amd64) failed to boot on J3455-ITX board (ASRock)



The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/58982; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrius V <vezhlys%gmail.com@localhost>
To: wgstuken%grimme-reitenspezial.de@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-amd64/58982: NetBSD 10.1 install image (amd64) failed to
 boot on J3455-ITX board (ASRock)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:04:20 +0200

 --000000000000dfaa46062ba602d2
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Hi,
 
 No worries. You can find my patch here
 https://netbsd.org/~andvar/identcpu-J3455.c.diff. It should apply without
 issues to netbsd-10 code.
 
 Regards,
 Andrius V
 
 On Tue, Jan 14, 2025, 09:29 <wgstuken%grimme-reitenspezial.de@localhost> wrote:
 
 > Hi,
 >
 > my current plan is to setup an unused system with 10.1 because I have
 > always build the system from the sources.
 > I have some patches inside that has not reached the main source, but
 > some of then I need.
 > So I have to integrate them again. (Some kernel related, some
 > user-level)
 >
 > But I cannot give an eta for this atm. - lot of 'normal' work.
 > I try to do this in parallel now to get forward with this.
 >
 >
 > W. Stukenbrock
 >
 > Am 13.01.2025 15:30, schrieb Andrius V:
 > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:01=E2=80=AFPM wgstuken@grimme-reitenspezial.=
 de via
 > > gnats <gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
 > >>
 > >> The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/58982; it has been noted
 > >> by GNATS.
 > >>
 > >> From: wgstuken%grimme-reitenspezial.de@localhost
 > >> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > >> Cc: port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 > >>  netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > >> Subject: Re: port-amd64/58982: NetBSD 10.1 install image (amd64)
 > >> failed to
 > >>  boot on J3455-ITX board (ASRock)
 > >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:31:35 +0100
 > >>
 > >>  Hi,
 > > Hi,
 > >>
 > >>  I had attached them .....
 > > Sorry about that, maybe there were filtered out by mail server, not
 > > sure.
 > >
 > >>
 > >>  now as inline copy again:
 > >>
 > >>  output of cpuctl identify 0 ...
 > >>
 > >>  cpu0: highest basic info 00000015
 > >>  cpu0: highest extended info 80000008
 > >>  cpu0: "Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz"
 > >>  cpu0: Intel Atom (Goldmont) (686-class), 1497.60 MHz
 > >>  cpu0: TSC freq CPUID 1497600000 Hz
 > >>  cpu0: family 0x6 model 0x5c stepping 0xa (id 0x506ca)
 > > ...
 > >>  cpu family     : 6
 > >>  model          : 92
 > >>  model name     : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz
 > >>  stepping       : 10
 > > Thanks again. I can confirm that your CPU has a newer stepping 0xa
 > > (10), thus a workaround is not applied. I will prepare the patch to
 > > remove the stepping check.
 > > It will be possible to test either by building kernel from current
 > > source or taking current image from
 > > https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/HEAD/latest/ around a day
 > > after commit.
 > > I will inform separately and let's see how it boots afterwards.
 > >
 > > Regards,
 > > Andrius V
 >
 
 --000000000000dfaa46062ba602d2
 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 <div dir=3D"auto"><div>Hi,</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"aut=
 o">No worries. You can find my patch here=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://netbsd.or=
 g/~andvar/identcpu-J3455.c.diff">https://netbsd.org/~andvar/identcpu-J3455.=
 c.diff</a>. It should apply without issues to netbsd-10 code.</div><div dir=
 =3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Regards,</div><div dir=3D"auto">Andri=
 us V<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container" dir=3D"auto"><=
 div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 14, 2025, 09:29  &lt;<a hr=
 ef=3D"mailto:wgstuken%grimme-reitenspezial.de@localhost";>wgstuken@grimme-reitenspezia=
 l.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
 gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
 <br>
 my current plan is to setup an unused system with 10.1 because I have <br>
 always build the system from the sources.<br>
 I have some patches inside that has not reached the main source, but <br>
 some of then I need.<br>
 So I have to integrate them again. (Some kernel related, some <br>
 user-level)<br>
 <br>
 But I cannot give an eta for this atm. - lot of &#39;normal&#39; work.<br>
 I try to do this in parallel now to get forward with this.<br>
 <br>
 <br>
 W. Stukenbrock<br>
 <br>
 Am 13.01.2025 15:30, schrieb Andrius V:<br>
 &gt; On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:01=E2=80=AFPM <a href=3D"mailto:wgstuken@gr=
 imme-reitenspezial.de" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">wgstuken@grimme=
 -reitenspezial.de</a> via<br>
 &gt; gnats &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost"; target=3D"_blank" =
 rel=3D"noreferrer">gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt; The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/58982; it has been n=
 oted <br>
 &gt;&gt; by GNATS.<br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt; From: <a href=3D"mailto:wgstuken%grimme-reitenspezial.de@localhost"; target=
 =3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">wgstuken%grimme-reitenspezial.de@localhost</a><br>
 &gt;&gt; To: <a href=3D"mailto:gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost"; target=3D"_blank" rel=
 =3D"noreferrer">gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost</a><br>
 &gt;&gt; Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost"; target=3D"=
 _blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost</a>, <a href=3D=
 "mailto:gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost"; target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">gnats-=
 admin%netbsd.org@localhost</a>,<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 <a href=3D"mailto:netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost"; target=3D"_blank" =
 rel=3D"noreferrer">netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost</a><br>
 &gt;&gt; Subject: Re: port-amd64/58982: NetBSD 10.1 install image (amd64) <=
 br>
 &gt;&gt; failed to<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 boot on J3455-ITX board (ASRock)<br>
 &gt;&gt; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:31:35 +0100<br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 Hi,<br>
 &gt; Hi,<br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 I had attached them .....<br>
 &gt; Sorry about that, maybe there were filtered out by mail server, not <b=
 r>
 &gt; sure.<br>
 &gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 now as inline copy again:<br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 output of cpuctl identify 0 ...<br>
 &gt;&gt; <br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu0: highest basic info 00000015<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu0: highest extended info 80000008<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu0: &quot;Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3455 @ 1.50GHz&quot;<br=
 >
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu0: Intel Atom (Goldmont) (686-class), 1497.60 MHz<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu0: TSC freq CPUID 1497600000 Hz<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu0: family 0x6 model 0x5c stepping 0xa (id 0x506ca)<br>
 &gt; ...<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 cpu family=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 6<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 model=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : 92<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 model name=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J345=
 5 @ 1.50GHz<br>
 &gt;&gt;=C2=A0 stepping=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 10<br>
 &gt; Thanks again. I can confirm that your CPU has a newer stepping 0xa<br>
 &gt; (10), thus a workaround is not applied. I will prepare the patch to<br=
 >
 &gt; remove the stepping check.<br>
 &gt; It will be possible to test either by building kernel from current<br>
 &gt; source or taking current image from<br>
 &gt; <a href=3D"https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/HEAD/latest/"; rel=
 =3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/N=
 etBSD-daily/HEAD/latest/</a> around a day<br>
 &gt; after commit.<br>
 &gt; I will inform separately and let&#39;s see how it boots afterwards.<br=
 >
 &gt; <br>
 &gt; Regards,<br>
 &gt; Andrius V<br>
 </blockquote></div></div></div>
 
 --000000000000dfaa46062ba602d2--
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index