On Fri, 2023-11-24 19:20:00 +0000, Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:
> >How-To-Repeat:
> $ cat ind.c
> extern int foo(int n)
> {
> int i;
> int s;
>
> if (n > 1)
> { for (i=0,s=0;i<n;i++,s+=i) ;
> if (s > 100) s = 100;
> }
> else
> { s = 0;
> }
> return(s);
> }
> $ cc -c -o ind.o ind.c -Wmisleading-indentation
> ind.c: In function 'foo':
> ind.c:7:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
> { for (i=0,s=0;i<n;i++,s+=i) ;
> ^~~
> ind.c:8:5: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
> if (s > 100) s = 100;
> ^~
> $
As I happen to have recent GCC versions around:
jbglaw@lili:/var/cache/laminar/x$ ./bin/gcc --version
gcc (basepoints/gcc-14-5622-g4d7647edfd7, built at 1700496389) 14.0.0 20231120 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
jbglaw@lili:/var/cache/laminar/x$ ./bin/gcc -c -o /tmp/ind.o ind.c -Wmisleading-indentation
ind.c: In function ‘foo’:
ind.c:7:5: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
7 | { for (i=0,s=0;i<n;i++,s+=i) ;
| ^~~
ind.c:8:5: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘for’
8 | if (s > 100) s = 100;
| ^~
So it's the same message generated by up-to-date GCC versions.
(Though the source is really bad to read...)
MfG, JBG
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature