NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/56487 (binary compat broken for COMPAT_NETBSD32)
The following reply was made to PR kern/56487; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
To: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Cc: "gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/56487 (binary compat broken for COMPAT_NETBSD32)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 07:02:13 -0700
> On Nov 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:09:33PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 02:52:26PM +0000, thorpej%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
>>> Synopsis: binary compat broken for COMPAT_NETBSD32
>>>=20
>>> Responsible-Changed-From-To: kern-bug-people->thorpej
>>> Responsible-Changed-By: thorpej%NetBSD.org@localhost
>>> Responsible-Changed-When: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:52:25 +0000
>>> Responsible-Changed-Why:
>>> TAke.
>>=20
>> This might be ARM specific, there is libc asm code=20
>> calling compat_16___sigreturn14.
>=20
> No, also happens for i386 binaries on amd64.
This is because syscalls.master for COMPAT_NETBSD32 is wrong for =
sigreturn14:
{
ns(struct compat_16_netbsd32___sigreturn14_args),
.sy_call =3D (sy_call_t *)sys_nomodule
}, /* 295 =3D compat_16_netbsd32___sigreturn14 */
(Those functions do exist on aarch64 and amd64.). This was all masked =
before because sigcontext wasn=E2=80=99t being used by libc.
-- thorpej
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index