[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: kern/55782: INET/INET6 only semi-optional
FWIW, plain INET6-less is ok. as a consumer of this, i've
helped keep it working. i don't personally care about this
case (no inet at all), but i support it working.
> and a disturbing number of warnings elsewhere (mostly "this
> statement may fall through", to which my reaction is "if NetBSD
> cares about this, why hasn't it been fixed? if not, why is the
> warning turned on?" - but those in general do not look related
> to the INET/INET6 removal).
these warnings are in 3rd party code we don't want to modify
just to avoid a useless warning message.
if they come up as "warning" not "error", that means we have
explicitly chosen to ignore this verbosely.
the warning-as-error in general is useful, but not for this
specific case. some we flat out disable or don't use.
Main Index |
Thread Index |