NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-xen/53965: XEN DomU fails to poweroff in new HEAD kernels
The following reply was made to PR port-xen/53965; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: port-xen-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost
Subject: Re: port-xen/53965: XEN DomU fails to poweroff in new HEAD kernels
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 19:11:44 +0100
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:40:01PM +0000, Greg Oster wrote:
> I'm seeing this with an 8.0_STABLE DOM0... I instrumented cpu_reset()
> with printfs before/after the call to HYPERVISOR_reboot():
>
> #ifdef XEN
> printf("calling HYPERVISOR_reboot()\n");
> HYPERVISOR_reboot();
> printf("done HYPERVISOR_reboot()\n");
> #else
>
> and both are printed:
> [ 119.1643554] xbd1: detached
> [ 119.3838479] rebooting...
> [ 119.3838479] calling x86_disable_intr()
> [ 119.3838479] calling HYPERVISOR_reboot()
> [ 119.3838479] done HYPERVISOR_reboot()
>
> I note that if I do a 'shutdown -h' I can enter 5 "+"'s to get to ddb,
> but once it hits the "done HYPERVISOR_reboot()" I can no longer get to
> ddb on the DOMU.
>
> Is HYPERVISOR_reboot() expected to return? The next line in
I don't think it should, indeed.
AFAIK shutdown -r always worked properly for me, even with 8.0.
shutdown -p never did
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index