NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/53546: ifconfig tapXXXXX problem (wrong unit name or panic)



The following reply was made to PR kern/53546; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, 
	gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/53546: ifconfig tapXXXXX problem (wrong unit name or panic)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:06:06 -0400

 On Aug 24,  9:05am, mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst) wrote:
 -- Subject: Re: kern/53546: ifconfig tapXXXXX problem (wrong unit name or pan
 
 | The following reply was made to PR kern/53546; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | 
 | From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
 | To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 | Cc: 
 | Subject: Re: kern/53546: ifconfig tapXXXXX problem (wrong unit name or panic)
 | Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:00:29 -0000 (UTC)
 | 
 |  msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost writes:
 |  
 |  >	ifconfig tap65537 create
 |  >	[ 1491.1341302] tap1: Ethernet address f2:0b:a4:1c:e7:17
 |  >	(not 65537 but 1)
 |  
 |  tap is not only an interface but also a character device and both share the
 |  same unit number. Device unit numbers are of type 'short'.
 |  
 |  >	ifconfig tap99999 create
 |  
 |  that translates to a negative device unit number that isn't validated.
 |  
 |  Checking the unit number for positive short values in tap_clone_creator()
 |  should fix both problems.
 
 Why don't we make cf_unit and dv_unit unsigned int?
 
 christos
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index