Re: lib/52007: New failures in lib/libevent/t_event test

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

The following reply was made to PR lib/52007; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, 
	gson%gson.org@localhost (Andreas Gustafsson)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: lib/52007: New failures in lib/libevent/t_event test
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:49:34 -0500

 On Nov 22,  6:25pm, kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost (Robert Elz) wrote:
 -- Subject: Re: lib/52007: New failures in lib/libevent/t_event test
 
 | The following reply was made to PR lib/52007; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | 
 | From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
 | To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 | Cc: 
 | Subject: Re: lib/52007: New failures in lib/libevent/t_event test
 | Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:23:30 +0700
 | 
 |      Date:        Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:15:00 +0000 (UTC)
 |      From:        christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
 |      Message-ID:  <20171122141500.F24B87A1EE%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
 |  
 |  (quoting Martin Husemann)
 |    |  | I'd argue that the test progam should be removed (from the ATF suite)
 |    |  | completely.
 |  
 |    |  Let's create a pre-test that tests if there is networking and DNS?
 |  
 |  I'd suggest just removing libevent from /usr/tests/lib/Atffile (add
 |  a little mechanism to bsd.test.mk to allow tests to be built, but
 |  excluded.)    Actually, is ".WAIT" already that mechanism?
 |  
 |  That is, leave the test there, and runnable manually as an individual
 |  test, but don't include it in the tests that ATF runs by default.
 
 Sounds good to me.
 
 christos