Re: port-amd64/52596 (Another netbsd-8 panic)

[Dominik Bialy <dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/52596; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dominik Bialy <dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
	gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, maya%NetBSD.org@localhost, dmb%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost
Subject: Re: port-amd64/52596 (Another netbsd-8 panic)
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:12:28 +0200

 On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Dominik Bialy wrote:
 > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:05:17AM +0000, maya%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > > Synopsis: Another netbsd-8 panic
 > > 
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > > State-Changed-By: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > > State-Changed-When: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:05:17 +0000
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > > Does the diff help? (it tests x86_fpu_save rather than x86_xsave_features).
 > > I am also interested in before/after values of:
 > > sysctl machdep.xsave_features
 > > sysctl machdep.fpu_save
 > > 
 > 
 > Current sysctls are:
 > 
 > yenn# sysctl machdep.xsave_features
 > machdep.xsave_features = 0
 > yenn# sysctl machdep.fpu_save
 > machdep.fpu_save = 1
 > 
 > I'll try applying the patch today and building the kernel.
 > 
 After applying the patch, the sysctls didn't change.  The kernel
 booted OK, and I'm waiting if it will panic.