Re: port-amd64/52596 (Another netbsd-8 panic)

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/52596; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-amd64/52596 (Another netbsd-8 panic)
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:05:34 +0200

 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
 --k6EFHl8BAJdJdtsVerf8WsjG26M4Cn0OT
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bEMGKxpLpP8OF3oCKWcxlCSVIQaaA4L2o";
  protected-headers="v1"
 From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
 To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 Message-ID: <dfc49986-f346-2575-aca2-42fde619924d%gmx.com@localhost>
 Subject: Re: port-amd64/52596 (Another netbsd-8 panic)
 References: <pr-port-amd64-52596%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
  <20171006053940.1CB755CD8%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>
  <20171009020517.BFF127A210%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
  <20171009080146.GA19490%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>
 In-Reply-To: <20171009080146.GA19490%yenn.ulegend.net@localhost>
 
 --bEMGKxpLpP8OF3oCKWcxlCSVIQaaA4L2o
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 Content-Language: en-US
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On 09.10.2017 10:01, Dominik Bialy wrote:
 > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:05:17AM +0000, maya%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 >> Synopsis: Another netbsd-8 panic
 >>
 >> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 >> State-Changed-By: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >> State-Changed-When: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:05:17 +0000
 >> State-Changed-Why:
 >> Does the diff help? (it tests x86_fpu_save rather than x86_xsave_featu=
 res).
 >> I am also interested in before/after values of:
 >> sysctl machdep.xsave_features
 >> sysctl machdep.fpu_save
 >>
 >=20
 > Current sysctls are:
 >=20
 > yenn# sysctl machdep.xsave_features
 > machdep.xsave_features =3D 0
 > yenn# sysctl machdep.fpu_save
 > machdep.fpu_save =3D 1
 >=20
 
 
 This means that xsave is not available and the FPU layout is FXSAVE.
 (Alternatively xsave has not been detected).
 
 > I'll try applying the patch today and building the kernel.
 >=20
 > Dominik
 >=20
 
 
 
 --bEMGKxpLpP8OF3oCKWcxlCSVIQaaA4L2o--
 
 --k6EFHl8BAJdJdtsVerf8WsjG26M4Cn0OT
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2
 
 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZ2zvkAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZs+sMQAJDKmoWBF/xp3N2Dtgfjsvsi
 Eixa6+pt7pHiu1pJy0aDwqLdSwW45VPb+4JQO6AdCUmwHpKaaMm7ffx219UO3Nij
 XP/n9efsrjYaV1Cwx4K5Ngy++0nIyJv4sLkJmxuH7zEAZj7XkLhJnobW0aPaj8Iz
 GYnYrPLo/Szy6l9Az2mBxQ9SX2dT9+O3jag/xPG2rJfQ/25T2dpoUNAP1c6vYYLq
 NoHn1FtSNJ8iXMXqQBS+9D/RRAsFigy4LOvIpWwADEjNb6QUORpvi78faWjm7IAr
 wep67qo6XOM9X9jMNUZh7P3Zb4unt+1LXrrnMni3qvwHzx6qdsHUKKzpMcjH+BeJ
 VDsJyVgovpFamRQWm49r8H0rLSexTgSCzFIZshs2htZFzkydguqZ5h7jRqQ0cXKL
 6BsYPmDoQvrSRc8vXOixJF6p9tHvPkhFYRbr4sVSC+22AuwSMmZGH1RoZhKDjG0A
 namEewSRhSxlazfAhDwcffo4nbdBeKce+uGweVgUSvWX196Tpudgu2U4ro0h/Af5
 hhknB8O30DNfL/3OxauJmoxSyEfl9XwSkFTOOERWlaYOrZB0wjEwt5ZW48zk41tP
 KYwSiSwk5v4GJ3eEvlOqqn85Kb3IKoHfKeW+DSjYhVLVaYde/lnZIjSpeiLNCEJv
 JHPbUkkQ90wacHzm+8ii
 =81Sj
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --k6EFHl8BAJdJdtsVerf8WsjG26M4Cn0OT--