NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-mac68k/51923: /usr/libexec/cc1: Cannot allocate memory



On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:55:01PM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-mac68k/51923; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: port-mac68k/51923: /usr/libexec/cc1: Cannot allocate memory
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
> 
>  joerg%bec.de@localhost (Joerg Sonnenberger) writes:
>  
>  >Are there any inherent platform reasons for not using the same limits as
>  >i386 by default? E.g. 256MB for MAXTSIZ, 3GB for data size and 64MB for
>  >stack?
>  
>  Wouldn't that be silly? 256MB text with 128MB total address space?

Total address space or maximum physical memory? That's why I asked
whether there are platforms reasons for very tight limits.

Joerg


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index