[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing
On Nov 13, 8:25pm, kuehro%gmx.de@localhost ("Kai-Uwe Eckhardt") wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing
| The following reply was made to PR lib/49387; it has been noted by GNATS.
| From: "Kai-Uwe Eckhardt" <kuehro%gmx.de@localhost>
| To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
| Subject: Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing
| Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:23:17 +0100
| > Yes, but it is more complicated than that.
| Yes I know, and I really think the world doesn't need long double. People
| should think about their algorithms before using it and about the performance
| penalty. But since it is part of the standards, programs like gcc and R complain
| about missing functions.
| Thanks for all your work on the long double complex functions by the way, it
| really helped to reduce test failures in gcc.
For now we can do the regular hack in the dummy functions... I think I'll
do that for expediency. I do have some work in progress fixing the issue
but it will be a while until it gets in commit worthy shape:
Main Index |
Thread Index |