[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing
The following reply was made to PR lib/49387; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Kai-Uwe Eckhardt" <kuehro%gmx.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:23:17 +0100
> Yes, but it is more complicated than that.
Yes I know, and I really think the world doesn't need long double. People
should think about their algorithms before using it and about the performance
penalty. But since it is part of the standards, programs like gcc and R complain
about missing functions.
Thanks for all your work on the long double complex functions by the way, it
really helped to reduce test failures in gcc.
Main Index |
Thread Index |