NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/45191: newfs_v7fs(8) doesn't work on a disk partition
The following reply was made to PR bin/45191; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: UCHIYAMA Yasushi <uch%vnop.net@localhost>
To: tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/45191: newfs_v7fs(8) doesn't work on a disk partition
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:15:52 +0900 (JST)
From: Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: bin/45191: newfs_v7fs(8) doesn't work on a disk partition
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:22:00 +0100
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 06:25:02AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> > The following reply was made to PR bin/45191; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >
> > From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
> > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: bin/45191: newfs_v7fs(8) doesn't work on a disk partition
> > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:20:04 +0000
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:30:01AM +0000, tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost
> > wrote:
> > > tron@lyssa:~#newfs_v7fs /dev/rwd1e
> > > newfs_v7fs: mmap failed. use direct I/O.: Invalid argument
> > > newfs_v7fs: sector=1
> > > : Read-only file system
> > > newfs_v7fs: Can't write back superblock.: Input/output error
> > > newfs_v7fs: Input/output error
> >
> > Is this because it's a partition or because it's too big to mmap?
> > (Does a 512M partition work?)
>
> It works with a 46.4MB partition:
>
> tron@lyssa:~tron#newfs_v7fs /dev/rwd0e
> newfs_v7fs: mmap failed. use direct I/O.: Invalid argument
>
> I can mount the resulting file-system and write files to it.
>
> > Of course, mmap'ing disk images is kind of silly...
>
> I would call it optimistic. :-)
>
> Kind regards
>
> --
> Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
>
16 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
c: 8388545 63 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0*-
8322*)
d: 8388608 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 -
8322*)
e: 8388545 63 Version 7 # (Cyl. 0*-
8322*)
disklabel location is LABELSECTOR(it is 1) of c-partition. and v7fs
superblock sector is 1. so conflicts.
16 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
c: 8388545 63 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0*-
8322*)
d: 8388608 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 -
8322*)
e: 8388543 65 Version 7
Should work. Some warning message should add to newfs_v7fs..
Remove mmap routines?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index