NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/44969: vmem_xalloc() don't search best-fit free segment in spite of VMEM_BESTFIT



The following reply was made to PR kern/44969; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: akachochin <bybinary01%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/44969: vmem_xalloc() don't search best-fit free segment in
 spite of VMEM_BESTFIT
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:48:21 +0900

 --0016364d2b0503389c04a7f48259
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 Hello , I'm Fumiyuki Yoshida.I send this patch.
 
 Thank you for replying my Send-PR.
 
 I think VM_BESTFIT search the smallest free segment that can satisfy the
 allocation.
 Also "Solaris Internals 2nd edition" says that about VM_BESTFIT.So,I send
 the patch.
 
   have you seen space efficiency problems due to this?
 >
 I don't get the problem due to this.But I found this code while I read the
 source code for study.
 If I make any mistake , I'm glad to tell me about my mistake.
 
 --0016364d2b0503389c04a7f48259
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Hello , I&#39;m Fumiyuki Yoshida.I send this patch.<br><br>Thank you for re=
 plying my Send-PR.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">I think VM_BESTFIT sea=
 rch the smallest free segment that can satisfy the allocation.<br>Also &quo=
 t;Solaris Internals 2nd edition&quot; says that about VM_BESTFIT.So,I send =
 the patch.<br>
 
 <br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
 t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=A0
 have you seen space efficiency problems due to this?<br></blockquote><div>I=
  don&#39;t get the problem due to this.But I found this code while I read t=
 he source code for study. <br>If I make any mistake , I&#39;m glad to tell =
 me about my mistake.<br>
 
 </div></div>
 
 --0016364d2b0503389c04a7f48259--
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index