NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/44969: vmem_xalloc() don't search best-fit free segment in spite of VMEM_BESTFIT
The following reply was made to PR kern/44969; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: akachochin <bybinary01%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/44969: vmem_xalloc() don't search best-fit free segment in
spite of VMEM_BESTFIT
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:48:21 +0900
--0016364d2b0503389c04a7f48259
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello , I'm Fumiyuki Yoshida.I send this patch.
Thank you for replying my Send-PR.
I think VM_BESTFIT search the smallest free segment that can satisfy the
allocation.
Also "Solaris Internals 2nd edition" says that about VM_BESTFIT.So,I send
the patch.
have you seen space efficiency problems due to this?
>
I don't get the problem due to this.But I found this code while I read the
source code for study.
If I make any mistake , I'm glad to tell me about my mistake.
--0016364d2b0503389c04a7f48259
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello , I'm Fumiyuki Yoshida.I send this patch.<br><br>Thank you for re=
plying my Send-PR.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">I think VM_BESTFIT sea=
rch the smallest free segment that can satisfy the allocation.<br>Also &quo=
t;Solaris Internals 2nd edition" says that about VM_BESTFIT.So,I send =
the patch.<br>
<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=A0
have you seen space efficiency problems due to this?<br></blockquote><div>I=
don't get the problem due to this.But I found this code while I read t=
he source code for study. <br>If I make any mistake , I'm glad to tell =
me about my mistake.<br>
</div></div>
--0016364d2b0503389c04a7f48259--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index