Re: bin/43408 (interrupting atf-run does not interrupt test)

[David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR bin/43408; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/43408 (interrupting atf-run does not interrupt test)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 19:51:50 +0000

 On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:30:05AM +0000, Julio Merino wrote:
  >  I don't agree.  Do you really want to end up mirroring external bug
  >  databases in gnats?  If so, there are many, many more tickets in atf's bug
  >  tracker that you should refill in gnats.  Do we do the same for any other
  >  3rd party software component in base?
 
 Upstream bugs that are filed here (that matter to us) are kept here
 marked suspended, yes. There are quite a few of them, actually.
 
 This is desirable for a number of reasons; e.g. it lets other people
 who've hit the same problem find the report easily.
 
 It doesn't affect you, anyway - gnats should not nag you about
 suspended PRs.
 
 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland%netbsd.org@localhost