NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bin/43408 (interrupting atf-run does not interrupt test)



On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:02 AM, <dholland%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
Synopsis: interrupting atf-run does not interrupt test

State-Changed-From-To: closed->suspended
State-Changed-By: dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 01:02:28 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
let's keep this open until it gets fixed, so it doesn't get forgotten about
in the (hopefully unlikely) event that jmmv's trac gets eaten by ethernet
monsters.

I don't agree.  Do you really want to end up mirroring external bug databases in gnats?  If so, there are many, many more tickets in atf's bug tracker that you should refill in gnats.  Do we do the same for any other 3rd party software component in base?

Itt's reasonable for users to file bugs against NetBSD for 3rd party components, but as soon as we know that such bugs affect upstream, we should redirect the ticket to them and be done with it.  Unless we want to fix it ourselves in the tree with a custom patch, in which case the ticket should remain open.

--
Julio Merino


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index