re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some applications die with segfault)

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On May 19,  7:42am, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some appli

| 
|    On May 19,  7:05am, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
|    -- Subject: re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some 
appli
|    
|    | hmm, what happens if you don't have /emul/netbsd32?  ie, just copy
|    | those /bin/ksh or /bin/sh files somewhere and run them as is.
|    | 
|    | /emul/netbsd32 is probably going to be going away as being used.
|    | i haven't really thought deeply about this, but, i don't want to
|    | keep two methods of 32 bit support around and the new one is much
|    | better, so it's likely this will disappear.
|    | 
|    
|    Static binaries are not supported then. Not that I will miss them but...
|    Linux provides both.
| 
| how does /emul/netbsd32 affect static binaries?

The /emul/netbsd32 userland portion of netbsd32 does not matter but the
kernel part matters for both. I think that the userland portion of
/emul/netbsd32 should be just handled by symlinks to the compat directories.

christos