NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/38554: kernel condvar wait functions should take an absolute timeout

To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/38554: kernel condvar wait functions should take an absolute timeout
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 21:38:46 -0700


On May 1, 2008, at 4:50 AM, ad%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:

This makes condvars slightly more compatible with the Solaris
interfaces. I think it should also be done before 5.0, because
it's a fairly major change to the interface and it would be good
to have it full stable before it is set in stone.

Agreed. What sort of timeout value do the Solaris CV routines take?Timespec?


-- thorpej

References:
- kern/38554: kernel condvar wait functions should take an absolute timeout
  - From: ad

Prev by Date: Re: kern/38540: recent i386 GENERIC kernel cannot boot with VIA chipset
Next by Date: Re: kern/38554: kernel condvar wait functions should take an absolute timeout
Previous by Thread: kern/38554: kernel condvar wait functions should take an absolute timeout
Next by Thread: Re: kern/38554: kernel condvar wait functions should take an absolute timeout
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index