Re: bin/38327: uu{en,de}code - any reason to use non-portable [sg]etprogname?

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Mar 29,  1:40pm, cheusov%tut.by@localhost (Aleksey Cheusov) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bin/38327: uu{en,de}code - any reason to use non-portable [sg

|  Is there anybody who call uuencode as foobar? :)
|  Seriously, if an independance of executable name is really your goal,
|  close this PR.

This suggestion is very similar to a suggestion from someone else a decade
ago to remove err() and change it to fprintf(stderr + exit( for portability.
Get on with the program. If your OS of choice does not have setprogname()
make them add it instead of making our own code "more portable".

christos