bin/38327: uu{en,de}code - any reason to use non-portable [sg]etprogname?

[cheusov%tut.by@localhost]

>Number:         38327
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       uu{en,de}code - any reason to use non-portable [sg]etprogname?
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    bin-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Mar 29 09:35:00 +0000 2008
>Originator:     cheusov%tut.by@localhost
>Release:        NetBSD 4.0_STABLE
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD chen.chizhovka.net 4.0_STABLE NetBSD 4.0_STABLE (GENERIC) #2: 
Tue Dec 25 17:42:38 EET 2007 
cheusov%chen.chizhovka.net@localhost:/srv/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
There are some problems in compiling NetBSD versions of uuencode and
uudecode utilities under other OSes (I need it under Linux) because
these utilities are not portable enough.  Non-portable setprogname(3)
and getprogname(3) functions are used.  I think there is no reason for
this.

See wip/netbsd-uuencode package. Trivial patches are there.

>Fix:

Unknown