Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bmake inefficiencies

Jason Thorpe <> wrote:
> > I chose int (which is what sig_atomic_t is) for portability.
> sig_atomic_t has been around for a fairly long time now, and NOT using
> it has a negative portability impact.

Yes I'll change it - I can deal with making sig_atomic_t available
if missing - that's the whole point of using autoconf for bmake.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index